The functions purity
and entropy
respectively compute the purity and the entropy
of a clustering given a priori known classes.
The purity and entropy measure the ability of a clustering method, to recover known classes (e.g. one knows the true class labels of each sample), that are applicable even when the number of cluster is different from the number of known classes. Kim et al. (2007) used these measures to evaluate the performance of their alternate least-squares NMF algorithm.
purity(x, y, ...) entropy(x, y, ...) S4 (NMFfitXn,ANY) `purity`(x, y, method = "best", ...) S4 (NMFfitXn,ANY) `entropy`(x, y, method = "best", ...)
predict
, which gives the cluster membership for each sample.x
is a contingency table.'best'
or 'mean'
to compute the best or mean
purity respectively.a single numeric value
the entropy (i.e. a single numeric value)
Suppose we are given l
categories, while the clustering method generates
k
clusters.
The purity of the clustering with respect to the known categories is given by:
Purity = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{q=1}^k \max_{1 \leq j \leq l} n_q^j ,where:
n
is the total number of samples;
n_q^j
is the number of samples in cluster q
that belongs to
original class j
(1 \leq j \leq l
).
The purity is therefore a real number in [0,1]
.
The larger the purity, the better the clustering performance.
The entropy of the clustering with respect to the known categories is given by:
- 1/(n log2(l) ) sum_q sum_j n(q,j) log2( n(q,j) / n_q ),where:
n
is the total number of samples;
n_q
is the total number of samples in cluster q
(1 \leq q \leq k
);
n(q,j)
is the number of samples in cluster q
that belongs to
original class j
(1 \leq j \leq l
).
The smaller the entropy, the better the clustering performance.
signature(x = "table", y = "missing")
: Computes the purity directly from the contingency table x
.
This is the workhorse method that is eventually called by all other methods.
signature(x = "factor", y = "ANY")
: Computes the purity on the contingency table of x
and y
, that is
coerced into a factor if necessary.
signature(x = "ANY", y = "ANY")
: Default method that should work for results of clustering algorithms, that have a
suitable predict
method that returns the cluster membership vector:
the purity is computed between x
and predict{y}
signature(x = "NMFfitXn", y = "ANY")
: Computes the best or mean entropy across all NMF fits stored in x
.
signature(x = "table", y = "missing")
: Computes the purity directly from the contingency table x
signature(x = "factor", y = "ANY")
: Computes the purity on the contingency table of x
and y
, that is
coerced into a factor if necessary.
signature(x = "ANY", y = "ANY")
: Default method that should work for results of clustering algorithms, that have a
suitable predict
method that returns the cluster membership vector:
the purity is computed between x
and predict{y}
signature(x = "NMFfitXn", y = "ANY")
: Computes the best or mean purity across all NMF fits stored in x
.
Kim H and Park H (2007). "Sparse non-negative matrix factorizations via alternating non-negativity-constrained least squares
for microarray data analysis." _Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)_, *23*(12), pp. 1495-502. ISSN 1460-2059,
# generate a synthetic dataset with known classes: 50 features, 18 samples (5+5+8)
n <- 50; counts <- c(5, 5, 8);
V <- syntheticNMF(n, counts)
cl <- unlist(mapply(rep, 1:3, counts))
# perform default NMF with rank=2
x2 <- nmf(V, 2)
purity(x2, cl)
## [1] 0.7222222
entropy(x2, cl)
## [1] 0.4380081
# perform default NMF with rank=2
x3 <- nmf(V, 3)
purity(x3, cl)
## [1] 1
entropy(x3, cl)
## [1] 0
sparseness